Jump to Navigation

Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers

$8,800,000.00 Settlement for Hispanic Man Who Suffered TBI in Bus v. Pedestrian Collision

Elias__4__2009.PNG

Click here to watch the CBS Chicago News exposé on this case.

An $8,800,000.00 settlement was reached in a Traumatic Brain Injury case that occurred on April 21, 2009. The lawyers representing the injured party, Leonardo Elias, are Lawrence Ruder and Louis Cairo of Chicago's Largest Injury Law Firm, GWC. The Defendant was represented by Kathleen McDonough, managing partner at Segal, McCambridge's office and attorney Brian Eldridge.

Managing Partner, Louis Cairo, and partner, Lawrence Ruder, resolved the lawsuit against Alltown Bus Company and their insurance carriers, Scottsdale, Lexington and Everest Insurance Companies. The Defendant stipulated to Liability and the parties agreed to a $13M - $6M High-Low arrangement, which included waiving all rights to appeal a jury verdict. The case was scheduled for jury trial on June 4, 2012. However, given the impending trial and the parameters of the High-Low, the parties agreed to attempt a mediation session in an effort to resolve the matter without proceeding to trial. Cairo and McDonough agreed to set up the mediation before ADR Systems and further agreed to have the Honorable Joseph Casciato preside over the all-day mediation at ADR Systems' offices.

The case involved a collision that occurred on April 21, 2009 at the intersection of Diversey and Austin in Chicago at 9 A.M. Mr. Elias had just walked his two young children to school and was walking to a Dunkin Donuts at the corner to get a cup of coffee before returning home. As he was walking in the crosswalk, with the green light and WALK sign illuminated, the Alltown school bus made a left turn across the crosswalk and struck the innocently walking pedestrian with enough force to throw him almost 10' in the air and slamming him onto the roadway and causing extensive head injuries.

Elias was admitted to Illinois Masonic Hospital where he had emergency brain surgery to evacuate a brain bleed. He went into respiratory failure and remained in a coma for ten days after which he was then transferred to a rehabilitation facility. Ultimately, Elias attended a six-and-a-half month brain rehabilitation program at R.I.C. in Chicago where he underwent extensive Speech, Occupational and Physical Therapy. He was discharged by R.I.C. with instructions that he could live independently and unsupervised in familiar environments.

The main issue in the case concerned whether Elias, 44 years old at the present, required a caregiver due to his head injuries. There existed support in the record for each party and the experts for each supported their respective positions as well, of course.

Plaintiff contended that Elias' TBI was a disabling injury despite the fact that he appeared to look and function normally. The defense disputed the extent of the disability and the need for any caregiver at all. Defendant's expert, Richard Lazar, MD, opined that since Elias was only educated in Mexico through 6th grade, and only had work experience as a landscaper, there was no normative data to support his true pre-morbid mental status. Accordingly, he opined that the extent of Elias's TBI could not be determined by any medical professional. Plaintiff responded with evidence that Elias held steady employment as a foreman of various landscaping companies, read blueprints, operated multiple types of machinery and was highly respected by his boss and co-workers. Plaintiff offered expert opinions from Dr. Phil Rushing on economic damages, James Radke on vocational rehabilitation and Dr. Gary Yarkony on Elias's future needs that related primarily to caregiving needs.

Plaintiff claimed medical bills of around $560K to date with no future medical expenses at all. Past and future lost wages were between $800K to $900K. The caregiver needs were ranged at $3M to $4M, and were the most hotly contested aspect of the litigation.

"This is why I became a lawyer" stated Lawrence Ruder, primary handling attorney. "Words cannot describe what it feels like to know that we were able to provide the financial security and just compensation to this wonderful family who have been through so much as a result of this tragedy. The harms and losses that they have suffered are enormous. Now they can start living their lives again and get Leonardo the assistance that we believe will improve his quality of life, and the lives of his wife and two beautiful young children."

Of significant interest is the fact that Pam Zekman of CBS news did an exposé  on "Unsafe Bus Drivers" which aired on April 26th and featured the Elias v. Alltown case. The footage included a video of the accident itself, which was caught on a red light camera, which would likely have been barred at the trial given Alltown's admission of liability. But it is on GWC's website, it is on CBS's website and it has resonated through the community since it was aired. "There can be little doubt that someone on the jury would have ultimately come across the piece and its effect on the jury's verdict could have been quite devastating to the Defendant," stated Cairo.

This is the fourth $8M+ result that GWC partners have secured for their clients in the last 12 months:

  • GWC Partners Joseph Sorce and Colin O'Malley secured an $8.376 million verdict for an injured Local 21 bricklayer who sustained severe injuries when a walking plank gave way underneath him, causing him to fall thirty feet to the ground below.
  • GWC Partners Louis Cairo and Colin O'Malley reached a record breaking $8 million settlement for a TBI injury stemming from a highway collision in Colorado

GWC is also representing the Estates of Kenneth Puplava, an ironworker who was killed in a construction collapse on February 8, 2011, and James Quigley, an ironworker who was killed at a new road construction project on Torrence Avenue and 130th Street which occurred last month. Both fatalities received extensive news coverage.

GWC is the Largest Personal Injury and Workers Compensation law firm in Illinois. The firm's attorneys handle catastrophic cases throughout the country in all types of cases involving, particularly, transportation industry, construction, nursing home abuse, product liability and mass tort.

Please contact Lawrence Ruder or Louis Cairo for further information related to this case or about GWC.

GWC Partner Lawrence Ruder Interviewed by CBS Chicago News on Upcoming Chicago Bus Accident Trial

busphoto.jpgLast night, GWC Partner Lawrence T. Ruder was interviewed by CBS Chicago News about an upcoming case he is preparing for trial alongside Partner Louis C. Cairo. The case revolves around a tragic accident involving an Alltown school bus that collided into a pedestrian as he was crossing at a Chicago intersection. The pedestrian, Leonardo Elias, suffered multiple skull fractures and injuries to the brain as a result of the accident.

Big Business Claims Changes Not Enough as Injured Workers Lose Rights

On June 28, 2011, the legislature enacted changes to Illinois' century-old workers' compensation system in an attempt to decrease the workers' compensation insurance premiums that employers pay. Ever since then, there has been much scrutiny over the effectiveness of these changes and whether or not they create a better business environment in Illinois. However, one important consideration has been notably lacking in recent conversations regarding the effectiveness of the new laws: the rights and protections afforded to workers who get injured on the job in the state of Illinois.

Auto Insurers Delay, Defend, and Deny Accident Victims' Claims

CNN ran a news segment about the all too common tactics of some of the large auto insurance companies like Allstate and State Farm when they are responsible for paying for medical bills and lost wages as a result of a car accident: delay, defend, and deny. This mantra perfectly describes the system that these insurance companies have set up in their continuing attempts to limit the amount of money they will have to pay to people who are injured due to run-of-the-mill car accidents.

Take, for example, the subject of the CNN piece: Roxanne Martinez. Ms. Martinez's car was sideswiped in Santa Fe, New Mexico and, as a result, she incurred medical bills and lost wages upwards of $25,000. Allstate Insurance, the second largest auto insurer in the United States, insured the owner of the vehicle who hit Ms. Martinez's car. As a result of the accident, Ms. Martinez incurred various medical bills for her treatment, which included undergoing diagnostic tests like x-rays and CAT scans as well as ongoing physical therapy.

When the time came for Allstate to compensate Ms. Martinez for these damages, Allstate offered her $15,000, or $10,000 less than the amount of money it would take to properly compensate her for her medical bills and lost wages alone. Allstate's $15,000 "take it or leave it" offer would only cover a fraction of the total damages that Ms. Martinez sustained due to the accident, including property damage to her vehicle. However, Allstate made this offer in order to close out their file and get rid of Ms. Martinez's claim as cheaply as possible.

According to an 18-month, nationwide investigation by CNN:

If you are injured in a minor accident, chances are high that [the two largest auto insurers in the country] would challenge your medical claims, offering you barely a fraction of your expenses. They would do it by forcing people into court, dragging out court cases for years, and by convincing the public it was all designed to fight growing fraud in the car accident business. But documents examined by CNN indicate the motive was profit, and Allstate has gone to great lengths to keep those documents secret.

If you have been involved in a car accident in Chicago or anywhere in the state of Illinois, you need to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney to advise you of your rights and to fight for you if the insurance companies decide to employ the same tactics as they did in the case of Ms. Martinez. While many insurance companies employ the three "D" strategy (delay, defend and deny), GWC has its own strategy to make sure its clients get the appropriate compensation for their losses: reputation, resources and results. As Illinois' Largest Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation Law Firm, Goldberg Weisman Cairo is uniquely positioned to handle any type of car accident case in Illinois. The insurance companies know that we are not afraid to go to court on even the smallest cases to make sure that our clients are fairly compensated. Our consultations are 100% free and we work on a contingency fee basis so you won't pay a penny unless we successfully resolve your case. If you would like to discuss a potential car accident case, call 800-486-1002 or click here to chat with an operator 24/7.

The SPY Who Suspended Your Benefits

It is well known that workers' compensation and liability insurance carriers take drastic measures to mitigate claims costs. Often times, their mitigation strategy will come in the form of an Independent Medical Examination (IME) where an insurance carrier's hired-gun doctor will render an expert opinion as to causality of an injured worker's medical condition in an attempt to suspend benefits or reduce damages. Under certain circumstances, however, Insurance companies will employ more invasive measures.

Insurance carriers have been utilizing video surveillance for quite some time. I know you are asking yourself if this is legal. Yes, it is legal. The second question you might ask yourself is whether the insurance carrier will actually waste their time and resources surveilling you. Once again, the answer is yes, they will.

Carriers justify this practice by making the public believe in the carriers' indignation to prevent fraud, but this is nothing more than a disguise of the carriers true intentions: to preserve its bottom line. In other words, they are looking to find a way out of paying benefits on legitimate claims. When the carrier places you under surveillance, they will follow you for several days and even weeks at a time. They will follow you to your doctor's appointment, to the grocery store and even to your daughter's wedding. They are looking to catch you at the most inopportune time. Here are examples of surveillance that caught injured workers at an inconvenient time:

  • A carpenter recovering from a rotator-cuff tear is filmed helping his wife carry groceries in the house
  • A school teacher, who is in rehabilitation for an L5-S1 fusion, is seen picking her crying son up from the ground and taking him into her physical therapy facility.
  • A laborer recovering from neck surgery is filmed in his garage, that was open, as he helps his son reach for an overhead object. At a later hearing, it was revealed that he was helping his son reach material that he would use in a science-fair project.
  • An electrical worker recovering from a total-hip replacement is filmed slow dancing with her granddaughter during said granddaughter's wedding (yes, they will even follow you into a wedding).

The moral of the story is to beware of the fact that insurance carriers have eyes, and these eyes are looking to catch you when the realities of life get in the way. Generally speaking, you should follow your doctor's orders as thoroughly as possible. You should also err on the side caution before engaging in an activity that could be interpreted as a violation of your work restriction.

Here are some tips for dealing with surveillance:

  • Keep your eyes open for Vans or vehicles not belonging your neighbors that are parked on your street for several days at a time
  • When Driving, always look in rear-view for vehicles that are following you
  • Do not hesitate to call the police if you see a strange vehicle parked near your house, if you notice a vehicle following you or if you think someone is trespassing on your property
  • When attending a social function that will be filmed: a wedding, Bat or Bar Mitzvah, sweet sixteen or quincienera; you must refrain from performing any act that violates--or even appears to violate-- your doctor's orders. Additionally, if you are the host, verify the identity of any person filming at your event.

If you have questions regarding workers' compensation in Illinois, contact the chicago workers' compensation lawyers at Goldberg Weisman Cairo. Call 800-486-1002 or click here to chat with an operator 24/7.

Cook County Jury Awards $5 Million to West African Family of 28-Year-Old Woman Killed in Indiana Crash

A Cook County jury deliberated yesterday until 5:00 P.M. after a three-and-a-half day trial and awarded the Estate of Hawa Sissoko $5 million for her tragic death on May 30, 2007. The trial centered around a high-speed collision involving this young woman who was standing in the middle of the right driving lane on Indiana Toll Road 80/94, behind her stopped vehicle at the Chesterton exit in Indiana. Whether her vehicle was disabled, ran out of gas, had a flat tire, or was "intentionally" stopped in the middle of the highway, we will never truly know the circumstances that led to Ms. Sissoko's untimely death. When the Defendant, Roadway Express's, 70-foot, 60,000 pound semi truck, driven by its operator, Alfred Baggiani, struck Ms. Sissoko and her vehicle, they both burst into flames and virtually melted Ms. Sissoko and her car to the front of the semi. As a result, her vehicle was so catastrophically damaged that the accident reconstructionists with the Indiana State Patrol were unable to determine the state of her vehicle prior to the crash.

The case was tried by Lawrence Ruder and Janine Rosana of GWC, Chicago's largest personal injury and workers' compensation law firm. Hanson Williams and Jim Lynch of Williams and Montgomery represented the trucking company and trucker involved in the collision. According to lead trial counsel, Lawrence Ruder, "Hawa's parents, who had not seen their daughter for the last 7 years of her life, flew halfway across the world to come to America to attend this trial. They came to an American courtroom seeking American justice for the tragic loss of their daughter." The evidence established that Hawa was a happy, productive and beautiful young woman who worked hard at her traditional West African hair braiding job and sent most of the money she earned back to her family in Mali in order to help pay for her sister and brother to attend law school and nursing school. She was the oldest of nine children and reportedly spoke to her family daily while living in Chicago with her paternal uncle.

In a surprise ruling, the Circuit Court allowed evidence of the fact that Hawa and her family were Muslim, that their faith required that she pray 5 times a day, and that there was a Qur'an found "in the ditch" at this site of the crash without any identifying marks or connection to the decedent. Based on this evidence, coupled with the fact that Hawa's stopped car was facing east and she was standing behind her car at the trunk at the time of the crash, defense counsel argued throughout the entire trial that Hawa intentionally must have stopped her car in the middle of the highway to either pray (the Muslim faith asks that American Muslims face east when they pray) or commit suicide. "We found this totally speculative argument to be offensive, highly prejudicial and racially motivated. The attempt to instill fear in the eyes and hearts of the jury was countered by compelling, compassionate and emotional testimony from Hawa's parents and brother, who portrayed her as a kind, loving, honest and very happy young woman whose death has completely changed their family forever. Moreover, when we discussed the defense of 'praying/suicide' with the jurors after the verdict, they indicated that they dispelled that speculative argument without any significant thought at all;" according to Ruder. "We are so proud to have been able to persuade this jury that in America, everyone is entitled to a fair trial regardless of their religious beliefs or the country they live in. Given all of the multi-cultural and multi-racial communities that make up the Chicagoland area, I hope that the message that there is 'Justice in America' resonates with all of these individuals;" stated Attorney Rosana.

This is the third seven-figure result in the last few months that GWC attorneys have secured for clients in unique fact or damage cases:

GWC is the largest personal injury and workers' compensation law firm in Illinois. The firm's attorneys handle catastrophic cases throughout the country in all types of cases involving, particularly, transportation industry, construction, nursing home abuse, product liability and mass tort.

Please contact Lawrence Ruder or Janine Rosana for further information related to this case or about GWC.

Technology Proves Successful in Traumatic Brain Injury Cases

Accidents involving fractured bones, severed limbs, brain surgery and other readily apparent types of damages rarely involve the issues that plaintiffs face in closed head injuries cases. The ability to take an x-ray or MRI/CT film, reproduce it and put it on an exhibit board or projection screen in a court room makes many physical injuries indisputable in a personal injury case. But closed head injuries are, by their very nature, much different types of injuries to prove to a jury. Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries [MTBI] are often catastrophic injuries to the victims and their families who live with the day-to-day impact that these devastating injuries cause. MTBI victims must deal with a wide range of health problems, including losses of cognitive functioning, such as the ability to multi-task, organize, appreciate safety aspects of certain activities, etc., as well as the negative effects of uncontrollable headaches, depression, fatigue, vision disturbances, auditory sensitivities and the many other problems associated with these types of injuries.

For many years, one of the difficulties with TBI cases is that defense attorneys who handle these cases were able to effectively argue that there is no way for the plaintiff to ever prove the existence of the alleged injuries associated with their claimed closed head injury. They argue to the jury in their statements and through their highly paid expert witnesses:

"Anyone can say that they feel different."

"Anyone can say that they have an uncontrollable headache."

"Plaintiff can not prove that there is any physical damage to his brain."

"You will never know if he really suffers from any of these reported conditions, because there's just no proof!"

But technology and advocacy have caught up with the charges of the defense lawyers, insurance carriers and the overly-paid slew of "defense experts" who made a tremendous living contending that victims of negligence who claimed to suffer a closed head TBI were faking it. The tactics that they have used for years to challenge or outright defeat the claims of those persons legitimately suffering from the pain, loss of enjoyment of life and physical impairments associated with the real injuries to their brain have become much less effective with the advancement of computer imaging known as SPECT scans.

brainscan.jpg

SPECT scans are computer images of the blood flow in the brain while a person attempts to use their brain for concentration activities. So the scan is done while the brain is functioning and the scan records imagery of the blood that flows through portions of the brain during the procedure. Those areas of the brain that have a loss of blood flow are depicted in the imagery based upon color (e.g. blue and dark blue). The scan results can unequivocally establish hard, objective evidence to prove that the physical areas of the brain that control certain abilities and capacities that we have as human beings have lost an abnormal amount of blood supply. Without a proper amount of blood supply to the brain, those areas can not work properly. Accordingly, the functionality that those damaged areas of the brain control will not work or function properly.

So, when a head injury specialist testifies that a patient suffers from vision disturbances due to a TBI caused in a car wreck, that doctor can now point to a piece of objective diagnostic evidence to support his or her opinion. Counsel will put the SPECT scan study up on a computer monitor for the jury to observe as the doctor explains how the scan proves, without a shadow of a doubt, that the patient suffers from an unusual loss of blood supply to the portion of the brain that provides and controls functioning for vision. And without the proper blood supply, plaintiff's brain will no allow him/her to see properly. The same means of proving a patient's TBI-related damages can be accomplished for all of the cognitive deficits and other injuries associated with a TBI utilizing this sophisticated computer imagery.

With proper technology and hardware, counsel can turn, rotate, flip over the brain scans and show the jury all different areas of the brain that suffered a traumatic injury, thus crushing the defense's arguments that the plaintiff cannot prove that they really have a brain injury. The animation below demonstrates how a SPECT scan displays images of the brain.

This image is actual evidence from a case handled by GWC Partners, Louis Cairo and Colin O'Malley, in a January 2012 Record Breaking $8,000,000.00 TBI settlement in Boulder, Colorado that was reached just 16 months after filing a law suit against a major trucking company for a vehicular collision that had occurred there.

Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers Reach $8 Million Settlement In Colorado Case Despite "Capped" Non-Economic Damage Law

An $8,000,000 settlement was reached in a mild traumatic brain/vascular injury case in Boulder, Colorado by two trial lawyers from Chicago's Largest Injury Law Firm, GWC! This settlement includes an apportionment of $400,000 for spousal loss of consortium and $100,000 for a minor son's leg fracture and exceeds the largest reported verdict in Colorado ever, by over $2 million for a TBI injury!

Partners, Louis Cairo and Colin O'Malley, resolved the lawsuit against a major trucking company on Monday, January 9, 2012, in a mediation that was court ordered under Boulder County rules. The case was scheduled for jury trial on February 13, 2012.

The case involved a collision that occurred on January 21, 2009 in Boulder, Colorado between the Hall's Toyota pick up truck and a semi tractor being driven without a trailer attached. The semi tractor was unable to stop for traffic on a rural highway, skidded into incoming traffic and struck the Hall vehicle. Steven Hall, 39 years old, was treated and released from the emergency room after it was confirmed that he only sustained a non-displaced fibula fracture and a few scratches. His condition became complicated weeks later as he began reporting signs of a closed head injury for which he underwent several months of therapy before returning to full time work as a computer consultant for a large HR software company. After working for 9 months, he suffered an aneurysm in his left subclavian artery requiring surgery which Plaintiff contended has significantly exacerbated his mild TBI symptom.

Plaintiff contended that the mild TBI was a disabling injury despite Mr. Hall's ability to work for 9 months in 2009 - 2010, drive his vehicle and seemingly function normally. Defense disputed any ongoing symptoms from the mild TBI and disputed that the left vascular injury was caisson related since symptoms were never reported during the 8 months following the collision, in addition to a pre-existing rib condition that predisposed plaintiff to genetic formation of this type of aneurysm. Defendant had ten expert witnesses in fields of neurology, neuropsychology, vascular surgery, functional capacities, vocational rehabilitation, biomechanics engineering, and economics. Plaintiff had experts in vocational rehab, functional capacities and economics, in addition to Carlyle treating doctors.

Plaintiff claimed medical bills totalling $500,000, mostly related to his left arm vascular condition, and a diminished earning capacity for income and benefits of $4-5 million, which was very disputed in terms of his capacity to return to work and the amounts claimed. Interestingly, Colorado's cap on pain and suffering and disability is $460,000 total! But Colorado has no cap on "physical impairment," which the trial attorneys successfully focused their damages case on. This is the second case in the last few months that GWC attorneys have scored a significant damage award for "physical impairment" damages. In the earlier case, GWC partners, Joseph Sorce and O'Malley once again, got an $8.2 million verdict in a severe calcaneal fracture case for a mason under Indiana law which included a $4 million award for this particular line item.

GWC is the Largest Personal Injury and Workers Compensation law firm in Illinois. The firm's attorneys handle catastrophic cases throughout the country in all types of cases involving, particularly, transportation industry, construction, nursing home abuse, product liability and mass tort.

Please contact Louis Cairo for further information related to this case or about GWC.

Chicago Taxi Industry Faces Major Reforms Addressing Safety Concerns

As we reported in a previous Chicago taxicab accident, there are a number of cab drivers in the City of Chicago who have been permitted to continue driving despite having dozens of traffic violations and convictions on their records. Another systemic problem with the City of Chicago's taxicab industry is that taxi drivers are actually encouraged to constantly be on the move, switching in and out of lanes, in order to keep their meters clicking as fast as possible. In response to these unsafe conditions and in an effort to "increase safety and bring Chicago's taxi fleet into the 21st century," Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced earlier this week that major reforms would be made to Chicago's taxi industry.

While some of the proposed changes merely address issues of convenience, like mandating that credit card machines and GPS are available in all cabs, most of the reforms will address the pressing safety issues that have plagued the city's taxicab industry over the years. Some of these major reforms include:

  • Reducing the mileage limit requirements for taxis (maximum number of miles before a taxi is retired would go down from 150,000 to 75,000 miles)
  • Implementing a real-time access system to the Illinois Secretary of State's database of moving violations, which would allow for the immediate removal of dangerous drivers off the city's streets as opposed to waiting for yearly performance reviews
  • An automatic denial of renewal policy for cabbies who incur three moving violations within one year
  • Limiting the amount of time that a cabby can drive to 12 hours, as is required by federal motor vehicle safety laws.

Hopefully, the implementation of these reforms will help to make the streets of Chicago safer. At the very least, by taking taxicab drivers with multiple moving violations off the streets before they injure or kill someone, these reforms should prevent tragedies like this Chicago taxicab accident we previously blogged about from happening again. If you would like to know more about taxicab accidents in Illinois or if you or a loved one have been injured in an accident involving a cab driver, call the Chicago taxicab accident law firm of Goldberg Weisman Cairo today for a free consultation or click here to talk to an operator 24/7.

The Difference Between Workers' Compensation Claims and Third Party Lawsuits in Illinois

The law offices of Goldberg Weisman Cairo offer free consultations to anyone who has been injured in the state of Illinois. A frequent question that comes up during these consultations is "what is the difference between an Illinois workers' compensation claim and a third party lawsuit?" Simply put, if you are injured on the job in Illinois, you cannot sue your employer; rather, you are entitled to benefits under the Illinois workers' compensation system through the filing of a claim. If your injury is the result of a third party's actions (i.e. someone who is not your employer), then the filing of a third party lawsuit will enable you to recover medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages incurred as a result of the injury. In either case, it is advisable to retain the services of an Illinois injury attorney to make sure that all your rights are protected and that you get fair treatment by the insurance companies. If you settle your case without an attorney or with an attorney that does not have the resources to appropriately handle your case, you may potentially receive significantly less from the insurance company than you otherwise would if you had hired a competent personal injury lawyer in Illinois.

Sometimes, a worker may sustain an injury caused by a third party while at work. For example, if a truck driver gets hit by another car while driving on the job, or if a construction worker slips on a tool that was left on the ground by an employee of another company, both the truck driver and the construction worker in these situations could be entitled to receive workers' compensation benefits and sue the party responsible for his injury at the same time. In these circumstances, it is extremely important to hire a law firm that has experience in workers' compensation and personal injury law. Hiring a competent Chicago personal injury law firm at the outset of your case will help to ensure that all legal remedies are pursued, no mistakes are made, no time limits are blown, and that you receive the compensation that you deserve. As Illinois' largest workers' compensation and personal injury law firm, Goldberg Weisman Cairo has the resources, reputation, and results to handle any injury case in Illinois and to make sure you get the best result possible. To speak with an experienced Chicago personal injury attorney, call us at 800-486-1002 or click here to chat online with an operator 24/7.

Questions? Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Goldberg Weisman Cairo represents clients in Chicago and the surrounding cities, including Arlington Heights, Aurora, Bloomington, Carbondale, Champaign, Chicago Heights, Countryside, Decatur, Evanston, Glen Ellyn, Joliet, Kankakee, Libertyville, Naperville, Montgomery, Oak Lawn, Oak Park, Rockford, Schaumburg, Springfield and Waukegan, as well as in communities throughout Cook County, DuPage County, Kane County, Lake County, McHenry County and Will County, Illinois. 

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.